For the cyber relationship abuse, there can be as much as 10

step 3. Results

Dining table step 1 portrays the fresh new incidence of any of the dangers of the analysis, according to the degree of seriousness located. In addition, it suggests new reviews between the withdrawals away from girls and boys into more risks. Full, the participants which demonstrated nothing wrong ranged ranging from % who’d no troubles which have tricky Sites use or over to help you 83.4% who had no problems with online grooming. We keep in mind that the variety of moderate and you will big troubles varied anywhere between cuatro% to possess sexting and you will 17% getting problematic Websites play with. 9% regarding reasonable/major troubles and in cyberbullying, they achieved 13.7%. The fresh new wavelengths based in the more degrees of dilemmas had been constantly better for women compared to people.

Desk step one

Prevalence of each and every of the threats since a function of the new seriousness of one’s disease into the overall test as well as intercourse.

In this regard, significant differences were also found between boys and girls in the mean total scores of cyberbullying victimization (Welch’s t = ?2.02, p < 0.043, d = 0.07), online grooming (Welch's t = ?3.51, p < 0.001, d = 0.12) and problematic Internet use (Welch's t = ?2.07, p < 0.039, d = 0.07). In these cases, the mean scores were higher for girls than for boys. There were no significant differences in the rest of the risks: cyber dating abuse victimization (Welch's t = ?1.9, p < 0.058, d = 0.12) and sexting (Welch's t = 0.94, p < 0.410, d = 0.03).

Regarding the type of school (private and public), significant differences were only found in the risks of online grooming (t = ?3.37, p < 0.001, d = 0.13) and sexting (t = 3.8, p < 0.001, d = 0.15). The mean scores were higher in public schools than in private schools in both cases.

In terms of the educational stage (1st–2nd grade of CSE, 3rd–4th grade of CSE and Post-secondary Education), statistically significant differences were found for the risks of cyberbullying victimization (p < 0.002), online grooming (p < 0.001), sexting (p < 0.001) and problematic Internet use (p < 0.001). The scores were higher in 3rd–4th grades, except for online grooming victimization, where higher scores were found in Post-secondary Education (see Desk dos ).

Table 2

Differences due to the fact a function of academic stage (1st–second, 3rd–next levels from CSE and you can Blog post-additional Studies) regarding dangers (letter = 3212, with the exception of the outcome away from cyber dating discipline that have n = 1061).

Note: Meters = arithmetic indicate; SD = important departure, F = Welch’s-F, p = significance; ? 2 = eta squared.

Desk step three shows the correlations between the individuals threats. Them had confident and you may significant correlations along, to the relationship anywhere between cyberbullying victimization and you will cyber relationships victimization position away. Internet sites dangers which have a sexual component (on the web grooming and you can sexting) was basically highly synchronised. Typically, the new correlations had been large to own boys in most of your own threats, with the exception of new dating ranging from cyber dating victimization and you can grooming and ranging from tricky Internet sites have fun with and you will cyberbullying victimization, on line brushing and you may sexting.

Table step 3

Note: The correlations for boys are shown below shagle buluÅŸma the diagonal and for girls above it. All correlations are significant at p < 0.001. M = arithmetic mean; SD = standard deviation.

Desk 4 gift suggestions the brand new comorbidities one of several various Web sites dangers related so you’re able to individual correspondence (cyberbullying victimization, cyber relationship abuse victimization, sexting and online grooming). Precisely the users which completed all the items in regards to the threats related to help you victimization (letter = 1109) was experienced (i.e., getting rid of on the investigation individuals who didn’t come with lover). Of one’s left professionals, sixty.7% exhibited a minumum of one of analysed threats (n = 674). The chance into high personal frequency are cyberbullying victimization (%), followed by on line brushing. The most common several-chance combos was basically cyberbullying victimization-on line grooming and you can cyberbullying-sexting. I emphasize the 3-chance combination of cyberbullying-sexting-brushing victimization. Fundamentally, 5.49% of one’s victimized kids showed all threats conjointly.